Building Safety Bill: McPartland-Smith Amendments

This is a guide to the McPartland-Smith amendments to the Building Safety Bill, as at 27 July 2021. We recommend that you read it together with the amendments. Many thanks to Liam Spender for providing this helpful summary.

  1. The Building Safety Bill is a wide-ranging reform of the rules around planning, construction and occupation of “higher-risk buildings”.  A higher-risk building is to be defined as any building containing 2 or more residential units and which is taller than 18 metres or has more than 7 storeys.
  2. The Building Safety Bill is currently at Committee stage in the House of Commons.  This will involve a detailed consideration of the Bill.  Committee stage will finish on or before 26 October 2021.  The Bill will then go back to the Commons for Report and Third Reading.  It will then be sent to the House of Lords to go through a similar process. 
  3. The Bill is currently expected to become an Act of Parliament (a law) early in 2022.  The new law will then be brought into effect over a period between roughly 2022 and 2025.  The new law will apply to both current and future higher-risk buildings.
  4. Stephen McPartland MP and Royston Smith MP offer amendments to the Building Safety Bill to protect current and future leaseholders: Amendments as at 23 July 2021.
  5. This summary explains the McPartland-Smith amendments as at 23 July 2021.
  6. Value Added Tax (VAT) Amendments:  Amendment NC1 makes future cladding and fire safety remediation works taxed at 0% instead of 20%.  Amendment 1 allows people who have paid VAT on such works between 17 June 2017 and 31 July 2022 to apply for a refund of that VAT.  Amendment 1 also provides that if landlords receive a refund of VAT then they must repay all of that refund to leaseholders in accordance with the terms of their leases.
  7. Better protection for current and future leaseholders:  Housing Act 1985 amendments.  Amendments NC2 and NC3 amend Part 16 of the Housing Act 1985.  This law, originally passed as the Housing Defects Act 1984, allows the government and local authorities to provide money to pay to fix buildings they think are in need of fixing. 
  8. The powers in Part 16 of the Housing Act 1985 were created and used in relation to Pre-cast Reinforced Concrete (“PRC”) houses built in the 1950’s and 1960’s.  The external walls of around 140,000 PRC houses had to be rebuilt as a result of defects in the concrete reinforcement.  Many of the affected PRC houses were sold as part of the early Right To Buy initiative. The new owners found PRC houses, even if unaffected, were impossible to mortgage or to sell due to the issues with the walls. 
  9. Recognising the injustice of the PRC housing situation, the Thatcher government stepped in with public money to make repairs to the PRC houses.  Homeowners received grants of up to 90% of the cost of the remediation works.  In some cases the affected properties could be bought back at a price that did not take into account any issues with the walls.
  10. Amendment NC2 gives the government and local authorities the necessary powers to deal with issues related to cladding and fire safety.  That then allows the government and local authorities to provide grants to leaseholders of up to 90% of the cost of remedial works, or else to buy back the properties.
  11. Amendment NC3 is a trigger.  It requires the government to consult with the Treasury and the Prudential Regulation Authority on the effects of the MHCLG’s Advice Notes on the housing market and on leaseholders and to report to Parliament on its findings.  This must be done within 6 months of the Bill being approved by Parliament. 
  12. Amendment NC3 requires that, if the government concludes that using its new powers under Part 16 of the Housing Act 1985 (as amended by NC2) would help leaseholders and the market, then it must use those powers and provide the money itself or via local authorities to fund grants for repair work. 
  13. The House of Commons must approve the government’s report.  If it does not, the government cannot bring into legal effect the new regulatory regime set out in Part 4 of the Bill.  The government must then make a further report to Parliament within 90 days.  The process will continue until the Commons approves the report.
  14. Better protection for current and future leaseholders: Building Safety Indemnity Scheme.  Amendment NC4 requires the government to create a fund (the “Scheme”) into which all builders of higher-risk buildings, residential mortgage lenders and residential building insurers must make contributions.  No builder will be able to obtain building control approval to construct any building unless it becomes a member of the Scheme and pays its dues. 
  15. The money raised by the Scheme will be used to pay for cladding and fire safety remedial works.  These  payments could be made through the amended Housing Act 1985 (see above), or could be made through the Scheme itself.  The proposed Scheme works in a similar way to the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (“MIB”).  The MIB pays for damage caused by uninsured drivers.  All car insurers are required by law to be members of the MIB.  The costs of the MIB are paid for by a charge on all car insurance policies.
  16. Better protection for current and future leaseholders and home buyers: limitation period reforms.  Amendment 2 extends the time allowed (known as limitation periods) for making claims under the Defective Premises Act 1972 and section 38 of the Building Act 1984.  The limitation periods are extended to 25 years, instead of the 15 years proposed by the government.  The change applies retrospectively, meaning it will capture all buildings built between early 1997 and early 2022, depending on when the Bill is passed by Parliament.  This change will also mean all future home owners and leaseholders will have 25 years to make claims, instead of the 15 years proposed by the government.
  17. Amendment 5 protects current leaseholders and homeowners where the 25-year limitation period runs out within 1 year of the Bill being approved by Parliament.  It allows those homeowners and leaseholders up to 1 year to prepare a claim under the Defective Premises Act 1972 or section 38 of the Building Act 1984.  The current draft of the Bill only allows 90 days to prepare such claims, which is unlikely to be enough time even where claims are possible.
  18. Clause 124(5) of the current Bill gives builders who may be subject to retrospective claims under the new law a potential “get out of jail free card” based on human rights arguments.  Amendments 3 and 4 remove this potential issue.  The courts will then be left to decide human rights issues, if any, arising from the extra time allowed to make claims in the ordinary way, as would happen in any other case.
  19. Better protection for future leaseholders: implied terms in building and renovation contracts and compulsory insurance for builders.  Amendments NC5, NC6 and NC7 protect future leaseholders and home buyers.  These amendments would change the law to make contracts for house and flat building and renovation subject to automatic rules (called implied terms).  Similar automatic rules already apply to things like toasters and cars.  The new automatic rules are to be backed with insurance policies or warranty schemes.
  20. Amendment NC5 provides for implied terms in every residential building contract.  These implied terms are promises that the flat or house is of an adequate design, is fit for residential occupation, complies with Building Regulations and uses materials that are of satisfactory quality.  Similar rules will apply to residential renovation work.
  21. Future buyers of flats and houses will have the benefit of protection in the form of a direct claim for breaking these promises, as they do now in relation to their toasters and cars.  Any owner of the flat or house in question, not just the original owner, will be able to bring a claim.  It will be for the builder to prove that the building complied with the implied terms.  The same rules will apply to residential renovation works.
  22. Amendment NC6 gives a 25-year limitation period for bringing claims in relation to breach of the implied terms.  The 25 years is to run from the date the property is completed.  The current law allows a 6-year period for making this type of claim.
  23. Amendment NC7 requires any builder selling a house or flat to take out an insurance policy that is at least as good as the basic policy terms to be set down by the government.  The government can also identify warranty schemes it thinks meet the same standards as the basic insurance policy.  The aim of this amendment is to ensure that there will always be an insurer or warranty provider standing behind the implied terms created by amendment NC5 for at least 25 years.  The same rules will apply to residential renovation works.

Prepared by Liam Spender, 27 July 2021

The End Our Cladding Scandal campaign calls on the Government to lead an urgent, national effort to fix the building safety crisis.

Follow us on Twitter
for important updates on the campaign, ways to get involved and new information

Find out more about the End Our Cladding Scandal Campaign

The post Building Safety Bill: McPartland-Smith Amendments appeared first on End Our Cladding Scandal.